American Association of University Women
ADVOCACY EDUCATION RESEARCH ABOUT AAUW MEMBER CENTER Join / Renew Contribute ShopAAUW
spacer
IN THIS SECTION
spacer
RELATED LINKS OF INTEREST
spacer
Partners, sponsors and advertisers support our mission. Learn more »
spacer
spacer

 


Effect of Supreme Court Vacancies Upon AAUW Issues

Key 5-4 Supreme Court Rulings

U.S. Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O’Connor has been the deciding vote in many important Supreme Court decisions affecting women’s rights, civil rights and liberties, environmental protections, personal privacy, voting rights, protection against discrimination, and more. If Justice O’Connor is replaced by a jurist who does not share her fair and independent perspective, the decisions below are among the key split (5-4) decisions in danger of being overturned.

Jackson v. Birmingham Bd. Of Educ. (2005) ruled that federal law protects against retaliation against someone for complaining about illegal sex discrimination in federally assisted education programs (Title IX case).

McCreary County v. ACLU of Kentucky (2005) upheld the principle of government neutrality towards religion and ruled unconstitutional Ten Commandments displays in several courthouses.

Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation v. EPA (2004) said the Environmental Protection Agency could step in and take action to reduce air pollution under the Clean Air Act when a state conservation agency fails to act.

Tennessee v. Lane (2004) upheld the constitutionality of Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act and required that courtrooms be physically accessible to the disabled.

Hibbs v. Winn (2004) subjected discriminatory and unconstitutional state tax laws to review by the federal judiciary.

Grutter v. Bollinger (2003) affirmed the right of state colleges and universities to use affirmative action in their admissions policies to increase educational opportunities for minorities and promote racial diversity on campus.

Brown v. Legal Foundation of Washington (2003) maintained a key source of funding for legal assistance for the poor.

McConnell v. Federal Election Commission (2003) upheld most of the landmark McCain-Feingold campaign finance law, including its ban on political parties’ use of unlimited soft money contributions.

Rush Prudential HMO, Inc. v. Moran (2002) upheld state laws giving people the right to a second doctor’s opinion if their HMOs tried to deny them treatment.

Hunt v. Cromartie (2001) affirmed the right of state legislators to take race into account to secure minority voting rights in redistricting.

Federal Election Commission v. Colorado Republican Federal Campaign Committee (2001) upheld laws that limit political party expenditures that are coordinated with a candidate and seek to evade campaign contribution limits.

Zadvydas v. Davis (2001) told the government it could not indefinitely detain an immigrant who was under final order of removal even if no other country would accept that person.

Brentwood Academy v. Tennessee Secondary School Athletic Association (2001) affirmed that civil rights laws apply to associations regulating interscholastic sports.

Stenberg v. Carhart (2000) overturned a state law that would have had the effect of banning abortion as early as the 12th week of pregnancy and that lacked any exception to protect a woman’s health.

Morse v. Republican Party of Virginia (1996) said key anti-discrimination provisions of the Voting Rights Act apply to political conventions that choose party candidates.

Lee v. Weisman (1992) continued the tradition of government neutrality toward religion, finding that government-sponsored prayer is unacceptable at graduations and other public school events.

Thanks to People for the American Way for compiling these decisions.

spacer
spacer